Pets and Family Law Disputes in Australia: Navigating the Murky Waters of Pet Custody

Clarity 2

Pets are often considered part of the family. When couples separate or divorce, determining who gets custody of the family pet can become a contentious issue.

Unlike child custody matters, there are no specific laws in Australia governing pet custody disputes in family law cases. However, the courts have been willing to consider pet ownership within the division of assets during marital settlements.

Family law disputes often involve complex emotional and legal considerations, and when pets are involved, the stakes can be even higher. The question of pet custody has become a significant aspect of family law cases in Australia, highlighting the evolving legal landscape surrounding our furry companions.

This article delves into how pets are viewed legally in separations, the intricacies of deciding on pet custody, and hopefully shed light on the evolving dynamics within Australian family law.

The Legal Landscape

In the eyes of the law, pets are traditionally considered as property rather than family members. This classification, however, is increasingly being challenged as societal attitudes towards pets shift. Many pet owners view their animals as integral members of the family, and as a result, courts are beginning to acknowledge the unique considerations surrounding pet custody.

In family law matters, the primary concern is the best interests of the child in cases involving human children. However, when it comes to pets, the approach is different. Courts do not apply a “best interests” test for pets, and instead, they consider factors such as who purchased or adopted the pet, who has been the primary caregiver, and the emotional bond between the pet and each party.

Deciding on Pet Custody

Determining pet custody can be a challenging process, and there is no one-size-fits-all solution.

In some cases, parties may reach a mutual agreement through negotiation or mediation, outlining visitation schedules and financial responsibilities for the pet’s care. When an amicable resolution is not possible, the court may step in to make a decision based on the evidence presented.

Factors that courts may consider when deciding on pet custody include:

  • Primary Caregiver: The court may assess who has been the primary caregiver, responsible for feeding, grooming, and providing medical care to the pet.
  • Emotional Bond: The emotional bond between the pet and each party is a crucial factor. Courts may consider which party the pet appears to be more bonded with.
  • Financial Responsibility: The party willing and able to assume financial responsibility for the pet’s care may be favoured in custody decisions.
  • Living Arrangements: The living arrangements of each party may also be considered. For example, if one party has a pet-friendly home while the other does not, this could influence the court’s decision.

Clarity 1 (2)

Challenges and Evolving Perspectives

While there are various factors that could be considered by the court in pet custody disputes, challenges persist in establishing a consistent legal framework. The evolving nature of societal attitudes towards pets has prompted calls for legal reforms to better reflect the unique relationships between owners and their animals.

In many family law cases, the emotional bond between the pet and the parties involved is a central consideration. However, assessing this bond objectively can be challenging, and the subjectivity of emotions introduces an additional layer of complexity to these cases.

Additionally, the legal classification of pets as property raises questions about the adequacy of existing laws to address the intricacies of pet custody. Advocates for change argue that a more nuanced approach, recognising the sentient nature of animals and their role within families, is necessary.

The Human-Animal Bond

The bond between humans and animals has been scientifically documented to have positive effects on mental health and overall well-being. Pets provide companionship, emotional support, and in some cases, even therapeutic benefits. Recognising this bond, some argue, is essential for crafting legal frameworks that prioritises the welfare of the pet in family law disputes.

Studies have shown that disruptions in the living arrangements of pets, such as abrupt changes in ownership or separation from familiar caregivers, can have adverse effects on their behaviour and health. Courts considering pet custody cases are increasingly taking these factors into account, acknowledging the potential harm to the animal in the absence of a thoughtful and well-informed decision.

Looking Ahead: The Need for Legal Reforms

As the legal landscape continues to evolve, so too does the consideration of pets in family law disputes. While pets are still legally classified as property, courts are increasingly recognising the need for a more nuanced approach that considers the well-being and emotional connection between pets and their owners.

Given the complexities surrounding pet custody disputes, there is a growing call for legal reforms in Australia. Proposals include the establishment of specific guidelines and criteria for determining pet custody, taking into account the best interests of the animal. Some jurisdictions in other countries have already taken steps in this direction, with courts considering the welfare of the pet as a primary factor in custody decisions.


The intersection of pets and family law in Australia is a multifaceted and evolving landscape. While there are certain factors courts may consider, challenges persist in establishing a consistent and comprehensive framework for pet custody disputes. As the bond between humans and pets deepens, it is likely that the legal framework surrounding pet custody will continue to adapt to reflect the changing attitudes towards our beloved furry companions.

Legal reforms that recognise the unique nature of the human-animal bond and prioritise the well-being of pets are essential for ensuring just and equitable outcomes in family law disputes involving our non-human family members. As Australia grapples with these issues, the journey towards a more compassionate and nuanced approach to pet custody is undoubtedly underway.

If you find yourself in struggling over pet custody during a separation or divorce, you can always get in touch with our team to discuss the options available to you.

Subscribe for all of the latest resources

Rli Samantha@2x
Samantha Miller

Samantha has been a lawyer since 2001 having followed in the steps of her father, grandfather, great-grandfather and great-great-grandfather. No one can say she didn’t know what she was getting into!

Initially admitted in 2001 as a solicitor in NSW and Australia, Samantha moved to the UK where she was admitted as a solicitor in England and Wales in 2002. After working in several different areas of the law in large London firms, she determined that family law was her calling and hasn’t looked back.


Oap Close
Not in Newscastle, no problem
online consulations available

Share This

Select your desired option below to share a direct link to this page